The Bears have never beaten Tom Brady

A board dedicated to Austin's up and coming Vintage league play. Includes overview, standings, results, and other relevant information.

The Bears have never beaten Tom Brady

Postby chenyan94 » Sun Jan 13, 2019 11:53 pm

— and this might be our last chance As the 1941 Major League Baseball season entered its final weekend Chicago Bears Hoodie , baseball fans wondered if the great Ted Williams would achieve the always exciting yet still impressive .400 batting average. He was hitting .401 entering Boston’s final series against the Athletics, and there was talk that perhaps he should sit out that series to make sure his average didn’t dip.But the Splendid Splinter was no louse. “If I’m going to be a .400 hitter, I want more than my toenails on the line,” he reputedly said. He played the entire series, cranked out seven hits in 12 at-bats, and finished the season at .406.Fans were ecstatic. This was a brilliant show of batting, drama and athletic boldness.What it was not, necessarily, was historic.That’s because Williams’ 1941 was the 28th time a major league ballplayer bagged the big 4-0-0, and ranked only 17th for the highest single-season batting average ever, far behind Hugh Duffy’s record .440.Only in retrospect did Teddy Ballgame’s .406 season average become part of history. After all, no one knew then that Williams’ 1941 would be remembered by future generations of baseball fans as the most recent .400 season MLB has ever seen.I feel the same way about the Bears 24-17 win over the Patriots in Week 15 of the 2000 season.There was nothing particularly spectacular about it at the time. We trailed 10-3, tied the game with 10 seconds remaining in the first half on a Shane Matthews touchdown pass to Eddie Kennison, scored on touchdowns in each of the next two quarters to go up 24-10 and held on against Drew Bledsoe and the Pats to get the W.That was December 10, 2000, a day remembered at the time as John Shoop’s first game as Bears offensive coordinator, following the pre-mature self-relieving of Gary Crowton. Our strong offensive showing came largely on the legs of James Allen https://www.thebearsfanshop.com/Jim-Mcmahon-Jersey , who grinded 97 yards on 37 carries and scored twice, once on a run and once on a catch.Other things people were talking about that day:Rookie Brian Urlacher, who was all over the field with nine tacklesPatriots first-year head coach Bill Belichick, who looked like his second NFL head coaching stint would be only nominally more success than his firstThe aforementioned Shoop, who helped the team produce its best passing attack in two monthsThe thrill of the Bears building a two-touchdown lead, only the fourth of the season, and maintaining control of a game through the fourth quarterWhat they were not talking about was the specific thrill of the Bears beating the Patriots. The Pats could have been any opponent that day and Bears fans would have been happy. But 18 years later, that game in December of 2000 stands as the final time the Bears have defeated New England, their opponent this Sunday. What felt normal in the moment has become a historical beacon of a bygone time. What changed, arguably, is another element no one was talking about 18 years ago: the Patriots rookie backup quarterback, Tom Brady.Yes, Ol’ Five Rings is a perfect 4-0 against our Bears. He got his first crack at us in Champaign in 2002. He was a Super Bowl-champion by then but far from the Hall of Fame, yet he engineered a dramatic comeback on the road, overcoming deficits of 27-6 in the 3rd and 30-19 with five minutes to go to lead the Pats to a 36-33 win, the game-winning score coming with 21 seconds remaining.We’ve played him every four years since then, with outcomes ranging from horrifying to distressing. In 2006 Dion Sims Jersey , both teams came in with Super Bowl aspirations. The 7-3 Pats won a dogfight against the 9-1 Bears, 17-13. This game is probably best remembered for Brady juking Brian Urlacher, and was the biggest “failed test” of the Bears v. Brady era.We entered the 2010 game as possible Super Bowl opponents once more, us at 9-3, them at 10-2. This one was over at halftime. The Pats went up 33-0 at the midpoint, scoring a 59-yard touchdown to Deion Branch on the half’s final play, and won 36-7. In my darkest, most cynical moments after the NFC championship game, as I clawed through a season’s worth of evidence to find proof that, “Well, we wouldn’t have won the Super Bowl anyway,” this game was where my brain went.Yet nothing was as ugly and draining as 2014. Under the impression that our previous game to Miami could be deemed “hideous” (the Brandon Marshall “unacceptable” game), we learned the next two weeks just what hideous looked like. The Pats started it off, going up 38-7 in the first half, and yet somehow making things worse by winning 51-23. (As for the next game, well... don’t click on this, I beg you.)And there you have it: four games against Brady Tarik Cohen Color Rush Jersey , four losses.He is 41 now, and if he reaches his goal of playing until he is 45, we might get another shot at him. But four years is a long way to go, and in the meantime I have to assume that Sunday’s game will be our final chance to beat the Hall of Famer.From an in-the-now standpoint, no win would be bigger for our Bears at this point in the season. Even with our MVP ailing, we have a shot to beat the NFL’s benchmark franchise. A win against the Pats would validate our collective inklings about this team’s potential. It would be a statement win, the first of the Nagy era.That said, readers of my work know that I am a sports fan who believes to a degree in Signs and Symbols and Enticing Statistical Irrelevance. And so I noted last week that the 2018 Bears play all of the same teams as the 2006 Bears, and that our only regular season losses that year were to the Dolphins, Pats and Packers.The prophecy states, therefore, that we will lose Sunday to New England, and then run the table to reach 13-3, ultimately losing to some schlubby carpet-treading dome-huddler in the Super Bowl. However I have instituted the 1984/1985 prophecy corollary to declare that our loss this year will be a Here We Come year, and we shall be glorious champions in 2019.But really, who wants to play that game? The Bears have bagged wins against just about every other significant quarterback I can think of, and I would prefer to send TB12 into retirement being just the least bit skittish around Bears or bears for the rest of his days.Also https://www.thebearsfanshop.com/James-Daniels-Jersey , I want to finally beat the Pats for the first time in 18 years, not to mention right here in the present tense knock off a Super Bowl contender and prove our might as a rising force.Losing to New England to preserve the prophecy (which might not even be real, when you think about it) would be the equivalent of resting for the final weekend to keep our average at .400. I’m with Ted on this one: if my team is going to be Super Bowl champs, I want more than our toenails on the line.---Jack M Silverstein is Windy City Gridiron’s Bears historian, and author of “How The GOAT Was Built: 6 Life Lessons From the 1996 Chicago Bulls.” He is the proprietor of Chicago sports history Instagram “A Shot on Ehlo.” Say hey at @readjack. Gamblers who thought they were outsmarting the house by betting on the Bears last week because of Dolphins quarterback Ryan Tannehill‘s shoulder injury got a rude awakening from Brock Osweiler on Sunday.Osweiler’s big game led the Dolphins to an overtime victory over the Bears, meaning people who bet big on Chicago lost. And there were a lot of those people: MGM sports book director Jeff Stoneback told ESPN that multiple six-figure bets were placed on the Bears.“There wasn’t much money on the Dolphins at all,” Stoneback said.That’s why, over the course of the week, the point spread moved by as much as six points in some sports books, from the Bears favored by one point to the Bears favored by seven points. All the bets that moved the line in the Bears’ direction lost.William Hill’s U.S. sports books told ESPN that Bears-Dolphins was the most-bet game early on Sunday afternoon, with twice as much money bet on that game as any other, and 85 percent of the money was bet on the Bears.All that money going on the Bears before Tannehill was ruled out raises the question of whether someone with inside information was putting the word out to high-stakes gamblers that Tannehill’s shoulder injury was more serious than his “questionable” designation would suggest. That type of thing is a big concern for the NFL.But just because a starting quarterback is injured, that doesn’t mean a bet against that team is a sure thing. All those bettors who put money on the Bears found that out the hard way.
chenyan94
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 1:58 am

Return to ATXMTG Vintage League

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron